A randomised controlled trial of the effect of regional nerve blocks on immediate post-tonsillectomy pain in adult patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-operative pain is the main cause of morbidity following tonsillectomy. The efficacy of glossopharyngeal and lesser palatine nerve blocks in controlling postoperative pain in adult patients was investigated prospectively. Patients 16 years and older admitted for elective tonsillectomy were randomised to one of three groups to receive a pre-incisional oropharyngeal injection of 0.5% bupivicaine, a 'dummy' injection of saline or no injection. Dissection tonsillectomy and general anaesthetic techniques were standardized. Postoperative pain was monitored for 24 h. ANOVA, chi2 and Fisher's exact test were used for intergroup comparisons. Ninety-two patients (72 women and 20 men), mean age 22 years were studied. Twenty-nine patients received 0.5% bupivicaine, 30 saline and 33 no pre-incisional injection. The overall mean pain scores of 2.1, 1.9 and 1.9 in the bupivicaine, saline and no injection groups were similar. Glossopharyngeal and lesser palatine 0.5% bupivicaine nerve blocks are not effective in reducing early post-tonsillectomy pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".