MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004143739 · doi:10.1007/s11746-008-1195-0

The Effect of Phospholipids on Milkfat Crystallization Behavior

2008· article· en· W2004143739 on OpenAlexaff
Yuliya Fedotova, Robert W. Lencki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsButterfatChemistryGlobules of fatSkimmed milkCrystallizationFood scienceAnhydrousPhospholipidMilk fatMembraneChromatographyOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Depending on the production method, the fat component in butter can either be in a continuous phase or entrapped by milk fat globule membranes (MFGM). Phospholipids like those present in the MFGM are known to affect milk fat crystallization behavior. This study examines the effect of MFGM phospholipid concentration on butter crystal structure. Regular raw cream was first concentrated to 85% fat via centrifugation to produce a “plastic” cream, and was then blended with anhydrous milk fat (AMF) and skim milk in order to maintain the total fat‐to‐water ratio while altering the total amount of MFGM in the butter product. Whereas mixtures of AMF and skim milk contained large spherulites that had finer structures as the degree of supercooling was increased, the addition of globular fat (GF) broke up these structures, eventually producing smaller individual needle‐like crystals. However, high levels of GF also lead to the coalescence of the aqueous phase, creating large water pockets that adversely affect sensory properties. Thus, the phospholipid concentration in the final butter product must be controlled in order to obtain optimal crystal structure and product quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFrench-language works237,207