Low maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy and oral clefts in offspring: The Slone birth defects study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy and oral clefts in offspring remains unclear. We studied this relation in a case-control surveillance study of birth defects. METHODS: From 1983 to 1997, we recruited 5956 study subjects from greater Boston, Philadelphia, Toronto, and parts of Iowa. The cases were liveborn infants with cleft palate alone (CP; n = 205), cleft lip and palate (CLP; n = 383), cleft lip alone (CL; n = 259), or Pierre-Robin sequence (n = 65). The controls (n = 4272) were infants who had no oral clefts but had one or more of the following defects: malformations of the digestive tract, reproductive organs, abdominal wall, and respiratory tract; chromosomal anomalies; inguinal hernia; tumors; and Mendelian inherited disorders. Based on maternal reports of alcohol consumption during the first 4 months of pregnancy, we derived average weekly consumption, average number of drinks per drinking day, and the maximum number of drinks consumed in a given day. The mothers also provided data on potential confounding or modifying variables, such as vitamin supplement use. RESULTS: There was no relation between maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy and CL or CP. The odds ratios (ORs) for cleft lip with or without palate (CL/P) were 1.0, 1.1, and 0.9 in women who consumed <1.0, 1.0-2.9, and 3.0 + drinks per week, respectively. These findings did not change when we considered possible modifying effects of vitamin supplement use. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support an association between oral clefts and a low level of alcohol consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".