MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DO RISK FACTORS DIFFER FOR CONCUSSION AND PROLONGED RECOVERY FOLLOWING CONCUSSION IN ELITE YOUTH ICE HOCKEY PLAYERS?

2014· article· en· W2004269162 on OpenAlexaff
Tracy Blake, W. H. Meeuwisse, Nicole Lemke, Kathryn Schneider, Kerry Taylor, Jane Kang, Carolyn A. Emery

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Sports Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionIce hockeyMedicinePhysical therapyPoisson regressionPoison controlInjury preventionPopulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Pediatric concussion risk factor identification will facilitate targeted injury prevention strategy development. Objective To examine risk factors for concussion and prolonged recovery amongst elite youth ice hockey players. Design Cohort study. Setting Community ice rinks and sport medicine clinic (2011/12 season). Participants Male and female elite Bantam (13–14 years) and Midget (15-17 years) ice hockey players (n=780). Assessment of risk factors Baseline age group, sex, previous concussion history and SCAT2 component scores [Total Symptom Score (TSS), Balance Error Score (BES) and Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score] were evaluated. Main outcome measurements Players with a suspected concussion were referred to a sport medicine physician by team therapists/trainers (n=137). Concussions with time loss of >10 days were defined as prolonged recovery. Results Concussion incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using multivariate (concussion) and univariate (prolonged recovery) Poisson regression analyses (cluster and exposure hours adjusted). Males were at greater risk than females [IRR=1.44 (95% CI: 1.09–1.90)]. In females with no concussion history, Bantam players were at greater risk than Midget players [IRR=4.04 (95% CI: 1.24–13.19)]. In Midget players, those with a history of concussion were at greater risk than those with no concussion history [IRR=2.68 (95% CI: 1.61–4.46)]. Players with baseline TSS in the lowest 25th%ile were at greater risk of concussion [IRR=1.50 (95% CI: 1.03–2.18)] and prolonged recovery [IRR=1.88 (95% CI: 1.18–2.99)]. Players with a history of concussion were at increased risk for prolonged recovery [IRR=2.02 (95% CI: 1.29–3.16)]. SAC and BES were not risk factors. Conclusions Age group, sex, previous concussion history, and baseline symptom reporting affected the risk of concussion and prolonged recovery in elite youth ice hockey players. This study will inform the development of youth sport concussion prevention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207