Further Insight into Thermally and pH-Induced Generation of Acrylamide from Glucose/Asparagine Model Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of numerous studies on the mechanism of formation of acrylamide (AA) from asparagine and reducing sugars, the decarboxylated Schiff base [ N-( d-glucos-1-yl)-3'-aminopropionamide] and its corresponding Amadori product [ N-(1-deoxy- d-fructos-1-yl)-3'-aminopropionamide) are considered to be possible direct precursors in addition to 3-aminopropionamide (AP). Furthermore, the mechanism of decarboxylation of the initially formed N-( d-glucos-1-yl)asparagine to generate the above-mentioned precursors also remains to be confirmed. To identify the relative importance of AA precursors, the decarboxylated Amadori product (AP ARP) and the corresponding Schiff base were synthesized and their relative abilities to generate AA under dry and wet heating conditions were studied. Under both conditions, the N-( d-glucos-1-yl)-3'-aminopropionamide had the highest intrinsic ability to be converted into AA. In the dry model system, the increase was almost 4-fold higher than the corresponding AP ARP or AP; however, in the wet system, the increase was 2-fold higher relative to AP ARP but >20-fold higher relative to AP. In addition, to gain further insight into the decarboxylation step, the amino acid/sugar reactions were analyzed by FTIR to monitor the formation of the previously proposed 5-oxazolidinone intermediate known to exhibit a peak in the range of 1770-1810 cm (-1). Spectroscopic studies clearly indicated the formation of an intense peak in the indicated range, the precise wavelength being dependent on the amino acid and the sugar used. The identity of the peak was verified by observing a 40 cm (-1) shift when [(13)C-1]-labeled amino acid was used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".