Isomerization-induced surface relief gratings formation: A comparison between the probe and the matrix dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report molecular dynamics simulations of the effect of the photoisomerization of probe molecules on the nonequilibrium dynamics of a bulk amorphous matrix. Is it the matrix or the probe that drives the dynamics in SRG formation? In the first picture, the probe isomerization induces the motion of the probe inside the matrix. The motion of the probe then induces molecular motions inside the matrix. In the second picture, the probe isomerization induces a modification of the matrix diffusion mechanism. The diffusion of the matrix then induces the motion of the embedded probe. To answer this question, we compare the motion of the probe molecules and the motion of the matrix molecules in various thermodynamic conditions. We show that when the isomerization is switched on, the matrix molecules surrounding the probe move faster than the probe. Around the probe, the structural relaxation time of the matrix molecules is shorter than the probe relaxation time and the diffusion of the matrix molecules is larger than the probe diffusion. These results show that the matrix motions drive the dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".