MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004518168 · doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.3.6

Normal Multiple Auditory Steady-State Response Thresholds to Air-Conducted Stimuli in Infants

2009· article· en· W2004518168 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Van Maanen, David R. Stapells

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyStimulus (psychology)MedicineTone burstElectrophysiologyElectroencephalographyPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to stimuli modulated at approximately 80 Hz are a promising technique for threshold estimation in infants, but additional data are required. RESEARCH DESIGN: We obtained multiple ASSRs to air-conducted (AC) stimuli. STUDY SAMPLE: There were 54 children in two age groups: > six months (N=32) and < or = six months (N=22). All infants had normal hearing by tone-evoked auditory brain stem response. RESULTS: ASSR thresholds, estimated from 50 percent using cumulative percent present distributions, were 36, 30, 24, and 15 dB HL at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. Most (> or =90%) of the infants showed present ASSRs at 49, 45, 36, and 32 dB HL at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively, with no differences in the results of younger versus older infants. When responses were present for all stimuli for both ears, most infants showed all eight responses within five minutes. Compared to ipsilateral responses, ASSRs in the contralateral EEG (electroencephalogram) channel were smaller and often absent. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon these data and the literature, normal AC ASSR "screening" levels would be 50, 45, 40, and 40 dB HL at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. Using the multiple-stimulus ASSR, infants with normal hearing referred for diagnostic electrophysiological threshold assessment can now be quickly confirmed as having normal thresholds for four frequencies in both ears.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of AudiologySame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207