MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004536438 · doi:10.2298/jsc121114010d

Strain differences in toxicity of vitamin K antagonist warfarin in rats

2013· article· en· W2004536438 on OpenAlexaff
Jelena Djokić, Marina Ninkov, Aleksandra Popov Aleksandrov, Ivana Mirkov, Vesna Subota, Luka Mihajlović, Marija Stojadinović, Dragana Stanić-Vučinić, Dragan Kataranovski, Milena Kataranovski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Serbian Chemical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin K Research Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
FundersMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
KeywordsWarfarinVitamin K antagonistCoumarinPharmacologyVitaminHemostasisStrain (injury)ToxicityAntagonistCoagulationPeripheral blood mononuclear cellMedicineInternal medicineChemistryBiochemistryIn vitroReceptorAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warfarin (4-hydroxy coumarin) is Vitamin K (VK) antagonist that inhibits Vitamin K-dependent (VKD) processes, such as blood coagulation. It exerts influence on some non-VKD-related activities as well. In this study, the effect of subacute (30-day) oral warfarin (2 mg L-1 and 1 mg L-1) intake on hematological parameters was examined in two rat strains, Albino Oxford (AO) and Dark Agouti (DA), that differ in their sensitivity to certain chemicals. Greater susceptibility to anticoagulant effect of 2 mg L-1 of warfarin was observed in AO rats and was associated with an increase in relevant hematological parameters in this strain. Although both strains responded to 2 mg L-1 of warfarin with quantitative changes in peripheral blood leukocytes differential bone marrow and lung responses were observed. Strain-related differences in proinflammatory activity of peripheral blood granulocytes and in mononuclear cell IFN-? production were observed. Recognition of differences in quantitative and qualitative effects of oral warfarin on processes other than hemostasis might be of relevance for those humans who are on warfarin therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Serbian Chemical SocietySame topicVitamin K Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207