Pharmacokinetics of Cladribine in a Rat Model Following Subcutaneous and Intra-arterial Injections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 6-8 per group) weighing from 300-450 g were used for the study. Each rat received a single dose of cladribine (CdA) by ia (1 mg/kg) or s.c. (2 mg/kg) injection. Pharmacokinetic data were calculated by standard procedures assuming a 2-compartment open model following i.v. bolus using WinNonLin and Rstrips, and differences between the two modes of injections were considered significance when p < 0.05. The results showed that plasma concentrations of CdA decreased rapidly following a biphasic decline after both ia and s.c. administrations. The AUC and t1/2 beta after a single 1 mg/kg ia and 2 mg/kg s.c. injection of CdA were 0.66 +/- 0.34 vs 1.2 +/- 0.3 microg x h/ml and 3.5 +/- 2.1 vs 4.5 +/- 2.2 h, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean absolute bioavailability following the s.c. injection was close to 90%. The inter-subject variability of plasma concentrations of CdA was 35% and 150% following sc and ia injections, respectively. It is concluded that the rat is a reasonably good animal model to study the pharmacokinetics of CdA in plasma, and that sc injection may produce more favourable pharmacokinetic profiles than ia injection following a single dose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".