MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Induced systemic resistance against three foliar diseases of <i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> by (2<i>R</i>,3<i>R</i>)‐butanediol or an isoparaffin mixture

2010· article· en· W2004750974 on OpenAlexafffund
A.M. Cortes‐Barco, Tom Hsiang, Paul H. Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Applied Biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyRhizoctonia solaniSclerotinia sclerotiorumAgrostis stoloniferaMethyl jasmonatePlant disease resistanceSystemic acquired resistanceGene expressionMicrobiologyPathogenPathogenesis-related proteinBotanyGeneBiochemistryMutantArabidopsisPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is a type of plant defence mechanism typically activated by non‐pathogenic root‐associated micro‐organisms and systemic priming of gene expression in response to subsequent pathogen challenge. ISR was found to be activated by PC1, a mixture of food‐grade synthetic isoparaffins and (2R,3R)‐butanediol, a volatile organic compound produced by bacteria. In controlled environment tests, application of PC1 or (2R,3R)‐butanediol to the soil reduced the diseased leaf area of Agrostis stolonifera by 20–40% for the fungal pathogens, Microdochium nivale, Rhizoctonia solani or Sclerotinia homoeocarpa compared to the water control. In A. stolonifera, expression of the jasmonate synthesis‐related genes, AsAOS1, encoding an allene oxide synthase, and AsOPR4, encoding a 12‐oxo‐phytodienoic acid reductase, and expression of a pathogenesis‐related protein gene, AsGns5, encoding an acidic β‐1,3‐glucanase, were primed for increased expression by PC1 or (2R,3R)‐butanediol when M. nivale was inoculated 7 days later. However, the compounds differed in their ability to induce expression prior to pathogen challenge. PC1 induced AsAOS1 expression upon treatment, whereas (2R,3R)‐butanediol induced expression of AsOPR4 and AsGns5 upon treatment. These results indicate that both (2R,3R)‐butanediol and PC1 can produce ISR in A. stolonifera but may do so through different mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Applied BiologySame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207