Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent condition with substantial heterogeneity in terms of clinical symptom profiles, overlapping syndromes and degree of severity. The challenge for any new antidepressant is to demonstrate efficacy across the spectrum of patient subpopulations with a diagnosis of MDD. The anxious depressed patient historically has a lower rate of response to traditional antidepressants and high pretreatment anxiety symptoms have also been shown to increase the risk of recurrence. In addition, severity based on standard antidepressant rating scale scores influences treatment outcomes. Some antidepressants display greater placebo separation at higher levels of severity while others fail to separate from placebo in more severe populations. Gender differences in antidepressant response have also been reported in several studies. In particular, women appear to experience a greater side-effect burden with current antidepressants. This is also important in treating late-life depression, where elderly patients are more prone to experiencing side effects and drug interactions. Despite the improved tolerability with SSRIs and other novel antidepressants, restoration of healthy sleep patterns has frequently been lacking. Finally, antidepressant efficacy must include demonstrated relapse prevention during placebo-controlled drug discontinuation trials. As a novel antidepressant with melatonin receptor agonist and 5HT(2C) antagonist properties, agomelatine has demonstrated efficacy in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Additional analyses support the benefits of agomelatine in anxious depression, increasing efficacy with greater baseline severity, including severe late-life depression. Agomelatine has also demonstrated favourable tolerability and efficacy in separate analyses of women and men and displays successful relapse prevention at doses 25 and 50 mg. Both subjective and polysomnographic measures of sleep support increased sleep efficiency and decreased awakenings during agomelatine treatment. Combining these efficacy data with favourable effects on sexual function, CNS and GI systems, there are grounds to endorse the view that agomelatine is a well-tolerated and efficacious antidepressant for a diverse range of depressed populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".