Morphological and molecular characterization of <i>Chalara elegans</i> (<i>Thielaviopsis basicola</i>), cause of black root rot on diverse plant species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extent of variation in colony morphology and chlamydospore size, septation, and pigmentation was studied in 50 isolates of Chalara elegans Nag Raj et Kendrick (syn. Thielaviopsis basicola (Berk. et Br.) Ferr.) originating from 12 different geographic areas and substrates. In addition, the extent of genetic variation among these isolates was determined using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Five general morphological groups could be distinguished among the isolates, two of which were aberrant phenotypes (albino and mycelial) that were derived upon continuous subculture of some wild-type isolates in the laboratory. The isolates with the most variation in phenotype originated from British Columbia and California. Six primers (10-mers) were used to generate 90 bands in RAPD-PCR, of which 75 were polymorphic. A high degree of diversity was apparent within C. elegans, and some banding patterns generated by specific primers were unique to certain isolates, thereby generating fingerprints. Distinct groups (clusters) were obtained following UPGMA analysis and, generally, these were composed of isolates from similar geographic regions or hosts. However, isolates from some areas, for example, British Columbia, were also found to belong to different clusters. There was generally a good relationship between groups assigned on the basis of morphology and those derived from cluster analysis, that is, isolates within a cluster tended to have similar morphology. In a few isolates, the aberrant phenotypes (albino and mycelial) could be distinguished using RAPDs from the wild type by the absence of 1 or 2 bands, indicating that changes in the nucleotide sequence had occurred, possibly through mutation. The average similarity index among all 50 isolates of C. elegans was 87%. An outgroup species (Chalara thielaviodes) had a similarity value of 40%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".