The TatA Subunit of<i>Escherichia coli</i>Twin-Arginine Translocase Has an N-in Topology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The twin-arginine translocase (Tat) system is used by many bacteria to translocate folded proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. The TatA subunit is the predicted pore-forming subunit and has been shown to form a homo-oligomeric complex. Through accessibility experiments using the thiol-reactive reagents 4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid and Nalpha-(3-maleimidylproprionyl)biocytin toward site-specific cysteine mutants in TatA, we show that the N-terminus of TatA is located in the cytoplasm rather than the previously assumed periplasm. We also confirm previous observations that the C-terminus has a dual topology. By treatment with the membrane uncoupler carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenyl hydrazone, we show that the topological state of the C-terminus is dependent on the membrane potential. These results suggest two architectures of TatA in the membrane: one with a single transmembrane helix and the other with two transmembrane helices. Molecular models of both topologies were used to develop and cartoon a homo-oligomeric complex as a channel with a diameter of approximately 50 A and suggest that the double transmembrane helix topology might be the building block for the translocation channel. Additionally, in vivo cross-linking experiments of Gly2Cys and Thr22Cys mutants showed that Gly2, at the beginning of transmembrane helix-1, is in close proximity with Gly2 of a neighboring TatA, as Cys2 cross-linked immediately upon the addition of copper phenanthroline. On the other hand, Cys22, at the other end of the transmembrane helix, took at least 10 min to cross-link, suggesting that a possible movement or reorientation is required to bring this residue into proximity with a neighboring TatA subunit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".