Negative Regulation of the Retinoic Acid-inducible Gene I-induced Antiviral State by the Ubiquitin-editing Protein A20
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activation of the interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) 3 and 7 transcription factors is essential for the induction of type I interferon (IFN) and development of the innate antiviral response. Retinoic acid-inducible gene I has been shown to contribute to virus-induced IFN production independent of the Toll-like receptor pathways in response to a variety of RNA viruses and double-stranded RNA. In the present study, we demonstrate that the NF-kappaB-inducible, anti-apoptotic protein A20 efficiently blocks RIG-I-mediated activation of NF-kappaB-, IRF-3-, and IRF-7-dependent promoters but only weakly interferes with TRIF-TLR-3-mediated IFN activation. Expression of A20 completely blocked CARD domain containing DeltaRIG-I-induced IRF-3 Ser-396 phosphorylation, homodimerization, and DNA binding. The level of A20 inhibition was upstream of the TBK1/IKKepsilon kinases that phosphorylate IRF3 and IRF7 and paradoxically, A20 selectively degraded the TRIF protein but not RIG-I. A20 possesses two ubiquitin-editing domains, an N-terminal deubiquitination domain and a C-terminal ubiquitin ligase domain consisting of seven zinc finger domains. Deletion of the N-terminal de-ubiquitination domain had no significant effect on the inhibitory effect of A20, whereas deletion or mutation of zinc finger motif 7 ablated the inhibitory function of A20 on IRF- or NF-kappaB-mediated gene expression. Furthermore, cells stably expressing the active form of RIG-I induced an antiviral state that interfered with replication of vesicular stomatitis virus, an effect that was reversed by stable co-expression of A20. These results suggest that the virus-inducible, NF-kappaB-dependent activation of A20 functions as a negative regulator of RIG-I-mediated induction of the antiviral state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | medium |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".