MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004912856 · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.043405

Dark state in ruby: Analysis of the feasibility

2000· article· en· W2004912856 on OpenAlexaff
R. N. Shakhmuratov, Arthur G. Szabo, Gregory Kozyreff, R. Coussement, J. Odeurs, Paul Mandel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersVlaamse regeringServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAtomic physicsMagnetizationExcitationGround stateCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Spin (aerodynamics)PopulationTrappingField (mathematics)Condensed matter physicsLiquid heliumMagnetic fieldHeliumQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bichromatic excitation of the ${R}_{1}$ line in ruby at liquid-helium temperature is considered. The frequency difference of the spectral components of the driving field is resonant with the energy gap between the anticrossed spin sublevels $+1/2$ and $+3/2$ in the ground state ${}^{4}{A}_{2}.$ The condition of the spin coherence trapping in the nonabsorbing state is analyzed. Population trapping is revealed in the reduced spontaneous emission from the excited state and in large spin magnetization of the ground state ${\mathrm{Cr}}^{3+}$ precessing with the frequency difference of the spectral components of the driving field. This magnetization can be detected by a pickup coil. The lifetime of the induced magnetization is strongly dependent on the ratio of the lifetime of the excited state $\ifmmode \bar{E}\else \={E}\fi{}$ and the spin coherence decay time ${(T}_{2}{)}_{\mathrm{spin}}.$

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicQuantum optics and atomic interactionsFrench-language works237,207