Enhanced oral absorption of halofantrine enantiomers after encapsulation in a proliposomal formulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the ability of a coated, encapsulated formulation to increase the oral bioavailability of (+/-)-halofantrine (HF) enantiomers, a drug with low and erratic oral bioavailability. After encapsulation of HF in distearoylphosphatidylcholine, the dried particles were coated with cellulose acetate phthalate. A suspension of the product was made using methylcellulose as a dispersion agent, and the product was administered to Sprague-Dawley rats to provide a HF dose of 7 mg kg-1 as the HCl salt. HF HCl powder in 1% methylcellulose with or without liposomal product excipients was also administered to separate groups of rats, which served as control groups. Serial blood samples were obtained from the rats and plasma was assayed by stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatography. There were no significant differences in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or maximum concentration (Cmax) between the two control groups. Plasma concentrations of both HF enantiomers were significantly higher in the rats given HF as an encapsulated proliposomal formulation compared with the control groups. Compared with methylcellulose control, the encapsulation product resulted in increases of 41 to 47% in the AUC of HF enantiomers, and 90 to 100% in Cmax. The ability of an encapsulated proliposomal product to significantly increase the oral absorption of HF was clearly demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".