Effect of Preoperative Delay on Survival in Patients With Bladder Cancer Undergoing Cystectomy in Quebec: A Population Based Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: In Canada there is growing concern that waiting time for cancer surgery has been increasing. We used population based data to estimate the average PD for RC in Quebec and assess whether delayed surgery has a negative impact on long-term survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the provincial billing database of the maladie du Quebec to identify all patients with bladder cancer 18 years or older who underwent RAMQ from 1990 to 2002. PD was calculated as the time elapsed between the most recent transurethral resection and the date of RC. Patients were categorized according to PD tertiles into 3 groups, namely 1) 20 or less, 2) 21 to 47 and (C) 48 days or greater. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of PD on overall survival, while adjusting for patient and provider factors. RESULTS: During the study period 1,592 radical cystectomies were performed. Overall median PD was 33 days (95% CI 30 to 35). Median PD increased from 23 days in 1990 to 50 in 2002. After adjusting for calendar year, and patient and provider variables there were no significant differences in survival among the 3 delay categories. However, patients subject to greater than 12 weeks of delay were at 20% greater risk for dying (95% CI 1.0 to 1.5, p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous reports PD greater than 12 weeks seems to be associated with a worse long-term prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".