Signaling network analysis of ubiquitin-mediated proteins suggests correlations between the 26S proteasome and tumor progression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We performed a comprehensive analysis of a literature-mined human signaling network by integrating data on ubiquitin-mediated protein half-lives. We found that proteins with very long half-lives are connected to form a network backbone, while proteins with short and medium half-lives preferentially attach to the network backbone and scatter throughout the network. Furthermore, proteins with short and medium half-lives are mutually exclusive in network neighbors. Short half-life proteins are enriched in the upstream portion of the network, suggesting that ubiquitination might help initiate signal processing and specificity. We also discovered that ubiquitination preferentially occurs in positive regulatory loops. Furthermore, these loops predominately induce or positively regulate apoptosis, a major component in cancer signaling. These results lead us to discover that the highly expressed genes involved in the common machinery of ubiquitination, the 26S proteasome genes, are significantly correlated with tumor progression and metastasis. Furthermore, expression of the 26S proteasome gene set predicts the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. Our findings have implications for the development of cancer treatments and prognostic markers focused on the ubiquitination machinery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".