MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005085962 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2010.2082510

Adaptive Time Domain Sparse Wavelet Approximations to Transient Space-Time Electromagnetic Wave Fields

2013· article· en· W2005085962 on OpenAlexafffund
Adrian Ngoly, S. McFee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveletWavelet transformComputer scienceAlgorithmTime domainElectromagnetic fieldTransient (computer programming)Fast wavelet transformTruncation errorTruncation (statistics)Cascade algorithmDiscrete wavelet transformPhysicsApplied mathematicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this contribution is to introduce a method for constructing temporally adaptive, sparse, accurate, efficient and reliable representations of large scale, discretely sampled transient space-time electromagnetic wave fields, through the use of sparse wavelet approximations. The temporally adaptive sparse wavelet approximations are achieved by performing a three step computational process during a time domain electromagnetic simulation. The computational process consists of a forward Fast Wavelet Transform (FWT) step, an adaptive wavelet coefficient truncation step, and an inverse FWT step. The sparse approximation of a space-time electromagnetic wave field results in retaining wavelet coefficients with the largest magnitudes, localized in regions of the solution domain with high electromagnetic energy density concentrations. Numerical results that demonstrate the applicability and versatility of the approach are provided. Rigorous error analyses are also provided to demonstrate the accuracy of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207