MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005111974 · doi:10.1094/pdis-93-8-0839b

First Report of <i>Mexican papita viroid</i> Infecting Greenhouse Tomato in Canada

2009· article· en· W2005111974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kai‐Shu Ling, Michael Bledsoe

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyViroidTomato yellow leaf curl virusSolanumBegomovirusTobamovirusPlant virusGenBankChlorosisPotato spindle tuber viroidVirologyCucumber mosaic virusHorticultureVirusBotanyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2008, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants in a large greenhouse tomato facility located in Delta, British Columbia, Canada exhibited general stunting, chlorosis, and purple-leaf symptoms that were distinct from those of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) (1). Diseased plants were localized mainly in two rows in a section of the greenhouse and produced no fruits or only fruits with reduced size. Leaf samples were collected from four individuals among numerous diseased plants in this greenhouse. Screening samples by ELISA, PCR, or reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for PepMV, Tomato spotted wilt virus, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus, Tomato torrado virus, Tomato apex necrosis virus, and Begomovirus, Tobamovirus, and Pospiviroid species showed that all four plants had a mixed infection of both PepMV and a pospiviroid. RT-PCR with the pospiviroid-specific primers Pospil-RE and Pospil-FW (3) amplified the expected 196-bp products from these four samples. Each amplicon was cloned into the pCR4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and one individual cDNA clone from each isolate was sequenced. BLASTN analyses of nucleotide sequences of these clones showed 97 to 99% identity to Mexican papita viroid (MPVd) isolates currently in the NCBI Genbank. These four newly identified MPVd isolates were not identical; seven nucleotide substitutions or indels were identified in this region. The full viroid genome was obtained by RT-PCR in isolate VF2 with a new reverse primer MPVd-RE (5' GATCCCTGAAGCGCTCCT 3') in combination with the forward primer Pospil-FW (3). Using the same approach as stated above, this amplicon was cloned and sequenced. The nucleotide sequence of the 196-nt amplicon previously amplified and cloned from the isolate VF2 genome was identical to this region in the genomic clone. BLASTN analysis showed that the VF2 genome (GenBank Accession No. FJ824844) had >98% sequence identity to each of nine MPVd isolates (GenBank Accession Nos. L78454 and L78456-L78463), 94% identity to Tomato planta macho viroid (TPMVd) (GenBank Accession No. K00817) and ~80% identity to Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid (GenBank Accession Nos. EF582392-EF582393). Prior to this find, MPVd had been identified only in papita (Solanum cardiophyllum) in Mexico and is considered a possible ancestor of TPMVd, Potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd), and possibly of other PSTVd-group viroids now infecting crop plants (2). The origin of MPVd in this greenhouse facility in Delta, British Columbia is unknown. The infected plants were destroyed by the grower. The pathogenicity of MPVd isolates characterized in this study was not evaluated on tomato because of quarantine regulations governing this viroid in the United States. The identification of MPVd infecting an important agricultural crop (tomato) outside its center of origin in Mexico indicates a potentially important major shift in the epidemiology of MPVd. To our knowledge this is the first report of MPVd from tomato in Canada. References: (1). K.-S. Ling et al. Plant Dis. 92:1683, 2008. (2) J. P. Martinez-Soriano et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:9397, 1996. (3) J. Th. J. Verhoeven et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 110:823, 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207