MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005126350 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2006.353754

Study of /sup 11/C-Acetoacetate Uptake by Rat Heart and Brain Using Small Animal PET Imaging

2006· article· en· W2005126350 on OpenAlexaff
M’hamed Bentourkia, Sébastien Tremblay, Jacques Rousseau, Roger Lecomte, Stephen C. Cunnane

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetone bodiesKetogenic dietKetosisPositron emission tomographyInternal medicineEndocrinologyChemistryMetabolismPerfusionMedicineDiabetes mellitusNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normally the brain almost exclusively uses glucose as a fuel but during fasting it can rely on the increased supply of ketones (beta-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate and acetone) produced in liver mitochondria from fatty acid beta-oxidation. Raised blood ketones produced on a very high fat ketogenic diet can significantly reduce seizures in children. Ketones also have other 'protective' effects on the brain but their metabolism by the brain is still poorly understood. The aim of the present work was to assess the brain uptake of11C-acetoacetate using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. In order to vary plasma ketones, we used rats (3 groups of 4 rats) under three dietary conditions - control diet (high carbohydrate; low plasma ketones), fat-rich ketogenic diet (moderate plasma ketones), and 48 h fasting (moderate plasma ketones). Tissue perfusion of the tracer and oxygen consumption were measured in heart and brain. In brain but not heart, the ketogenic diet enhanced tracer perfusion and oxygen consumption relative to the two other diets. Our data show that the brain's ability to utilize increased availability of blood ketones may relate in some way to concurrent glucose availability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference RecordSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207