MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005137352 · doi:10.1021/bp010050n

Comparison of Energy-Minimized Structures of [PdII(N-methyliminodiacetate)] Complexes of X1-His-X3-His-His Peptides as an Analysis of Steric and Specific Interactions with Synthetic Binding Tags for IMAC Separations

2001· article· en· W2005137352 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matthew S. Ward, Mohammad M. Ataai, Richard R. Koepsel, Rex E. Shepherd⊛

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology Progress · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of PittsburghRyerson University
KeywordsChemistryPeptidePhenylalanineAmine gas treatingSteric effectsStereochemistryTyrosineAmino acidCrystallographyGlycineStackingOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Pd(II)(mida)(peptide)] complexes for the series of peptides of sequence X(1)-His-X(3)-His-His were studied by molecular mechanics methods using Spartan, MMFF94, and SYBYL programs with X(1) = X(3) = glycine (G), phenylalanine (F), tyrosine (Y), tryptophan (W), and with X(1) = glycine (G) and X(3) = proline (P). For comparison purposes, data were also obtained for the Ser-Pro-His-His-Gly (SPHHG) and the (His)(5) peptides.The latter two peptides and GHPHH are tags in current use for IMAC separations. These provide calibration points as to the binding affinities that have been determined for the entire series. The energies of the complexes, as an average trend found from the composite behavior of the three methods, were found to be SPHHG (205 kcal/mol) (most stable; are values obtained by MMFF94 methods) < HH(#)HH(#)H(#) (222; where # implies the site of attachment to match the other X(1)-His-X(3)-His-His peptides) < YHYHH (249) < GHGHH (265) < WHWHH (284) approximately GHPHH (286) < FHFHH (311) (least stable), implying that FHFHH might be a useful chromatographic tag for IMAC protein separations that would elute more readily than GHPHH from IMAC sites that are of square-planar structure, such as Cu(II)(ida-supported) IMAC columns. Specific H-bonded interactions are observed between the tyrosine X(1) and pendant carboxylates and between X(3) and the N-terminal amine of [Pd(mida)(YHYHH)]. Face-to-pi-face ring stacking occurs between phenylalanine X(1) and X(3) units in [Pd(mida)(FHFHH)], whereas edge C-H to pi H-bonding or pi stacking occurs between the X(1) and X(3) tryptophans of [Pd(mida)(WHWHH)]. Two energy minima were found with tryptophan. The more stable form has the aromatic rings more parallel, similar to the stacked form of phenylalanine, rather than the edge C-H to pi H-bonding, and virtually the same overall energy as for [Pd(mida)(GHPHH)]. The "perpendicular" structure was found as an initial local energy minimum, but additional MMFF94 calculations found the pi -stacked arrangement at energy ca. 39 kcal/mol lower than that of the nearly "perpendicular" arrangement of the tryptophan rings, a composite effect of relaxation of the peptide, together with differences in stabilities imparted by the differing geometries. The use of the terms "pi-stacked " and "perpendicular" forms represent the limiting cases available to the tryptophan side chain groups. A twist of about 15 degrees to 20 degrees in dihedral angle is all that is necessary to change between structures that are nearly described as one form or the other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology ProgressSame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207