Ocular anterior segment changes in pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes occurring in the cornea, anterior segment anatomy, and intraocular pressure (IOP) in pregnant women. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel. DESIGN: Prospective single-center comparative study. METHODS: The Ocular Response Analyzer dynamic bidirectional applanation device and the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug imaging system were used to obtain data on the anterior eye segments of healthy pregnant and nonpregnant women. RESULTS: Sixty pregnant and 60 nonpregnant women were enrolled. The Goldmann-correlated IOP and corneal-compensated IOP were significantly lower in the pregnant group (mean 10.96 mm Hg versus 12.97 mm Hg, P<.001; and 10.97 mm Hg versus 13.16 mm Hg, P<.001, respectively). The corneal front steep keratometry value was statistically significantly higher in the pregnant group (44.81 diopters [D] versus 44.1 D, P=.039). No significant difference was found in corneal hysteresis, the corneal resistance factor, corneal posterior curvature, central corneal thickness and volume, anterior chamber depth and volume, or iridocorneal angle. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy was associated with greater corneal curvature and lower IOP. Further studies should be performed to learn whether these alterations result from changes in corneal biomechanical properties during pregnancy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".