A Prospective Study of the Offspring of Bipolar Parents Responsive and Nonresponsive to Lithium Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The descriptions of clinical course among bipolar youths vary significantly and differ markedly from the findings described in classical studies of bipolar adults. This difference may in part reflect genetic heterogeneity. Response to lithium monotherapy identifies a homogeneous subgroup of bipolar adults. The aim of this study was to prospectively characterize the clinical course, including antecedent and comorbid conditions, among the offspring of 2 groups of bipolar parents divided on the basis of response to lithium. METHOD: Parents were identified from families participating in ongoing molecular genetic studies and selected from specialty affective disorder clinics. For each child, 1 parent met Research Diagnostic Criteria/DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I disorder and either response or nonresponse to lithium prophylaxis. The other parent had no lifetime history of a major psychiatric illness. Blind to family affiliation and lithium response, all eligible offspring aged 10 to 25 years were interviewed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL), and best-estimate diagnoses were made by a panel of experts. Offspring were then reassessed over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Offspring of lithium responders (N = 34) had good premorbid functioning and manifested classical mood disorders with an episodic course. Comorbid conditions in this group remitted prior to the mood disorder. In contrast, offspring of lithium nonresponders (N = 21) had poorer premorbid functioning and manifested mood disorders with a chronic course. Comorbid conditions continued alongside the mood disorder. Clinical course among affected offspring was predicted by the disease course of the parent. CONCLUSION: The pattern of clinical course, remitting or nonremitting, appears to be inherited. Among the offspring of lithium-responsive bipolar parents, an early-onset subgroup with a classical episodic clinical course can be identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".