MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005184775 · doi:10.1139/p99-072

Shell-model tests of the bimodal partial state densities in a 2 × 2 partitioned embedded random matrix ensemble

2000· article· en· W2005184775 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V. K. Brahman Kota, Debasish Majumdar, Rizwan Haq, R. J. LeClair

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLinear subspaceBinary numberShell (structure)Mixing (physics)SHELL modelMatrix (chemical analysis)Random matrixState (computer science)Statistical physicsCanonical ensembleNucleusQuantum mechanicsAtomic physicsPure mathematicsStatisticsAlgorithmMonte Carlo method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mixing of well-separated subspacesof an interacting many-particle system,such as a nucleus with active nucleons distributed in more than one major shell,can be studied usingpartitioned embedded ensembles of random matrices. The bimodalform of partial state densities (one-point functions) predictedearlier for a 2 × 2 partitioned embedded ensemble, whichmay be regarded as a model for the mixing of two well-separated degeneratesubspaces, is tested using nuclear shell-model calculations in the[(ds) 6 ⊕ (ds) 4 (f 7/2 ) 2 ] J=0,T=0 space. Thetheoretical forms predicted by the binary correlationapproximation theory are in good agreement with the shell-modelresults. This suggests that with suitable extensions it might be feasibleto use the binary correlation method to deal with severalinteracting subspaces involving multimodal distributions.PACS Nos.: 05.30.-d, 05.45.Mt, 24.60.Lz

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207