MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pathobiology of Pituitary Adenomas and Carcinomas

2006· article· en· W2005236094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenomaProlactinMedicinePituitary adenomaPathologyProliferating cell nuclear antigenLesionHormoneInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine relationships between pituitary tumors and lesion size, invasiveness, resectability, deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy, cell cycle profile, mitotic activity, and immunoreactivity for MIB-1, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), p27Kip1, and p53. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-three adenomas of most pathological subtypes, including 20 medically treated and prolactin and growth hormone-containing tumors, as well as 10 premetastatic tumors and 13 pituitary carcinomas, were studied. RESULTS: Significant (P < 0.05) differences were noted between functional versus nonfunctional adenomas (percent aneuploidy, percent S phase, p27Kip1 labeling indices [LI], male sex, tumor size, and frequency of visual disturbance); Cushing's versus silent adrenocorticotropin adenomas (percent hypertetraploidy, p53 LI, tumor size, visual disturbance, and resectability); untreated versus medically treated prolactin cell adenomas (MIB-1 LI, p53 LI, and resectability); untreated versus medically treated growth hormone-containing adenomas (percent diploidy, percent S phase, MIB-1 LI, p53 LI, and p27 LI); untreated prolactin cell adenomas versus premetastatic tumors (percent hypertetraploidy, PCNA LI, p53 LI, invasiveness, and resectability); untreated growth hormone-containing adenomas versus premetastatic tumors (percent diploidy, percent S phase, PCNA LI, p53 LI, invasiveness, and resectability); Cushing's adenomas versus premetastatic tumors (percent diploidy, percent hypertetraploidy, percent S phase, MIB-1 LI, p53 LI, tumor size, invasiveness, visual disturbance, and resectability); Nelson's adenomas versus premetastatic tumors (p53 LI, tumor size, invasiveness, and resectability); silent adenomas as a whole versus nonfunctional adenomas (percent nondiploid, percent S phase, invasiveness, and respectability); silent adrenocorticotropin adenomas I and II versus silent adenoma Subtype III (invasiveness); silent adrenocorticotropin adenoma Subtypes I and II versus premetastatic tumors (MIB-1 LI and invasiveness); silent adenoma Subtype III versus premetastatic tumors (PCNA and p53 LI); and premetastatic tumors versus metastatic pituitary carcinomas (MIB-1 LI). CONCLUSION: Only trends toward differences were noted between Cushing's versus Nelson's adenomas and between prolactinomas of reproductive female patients versus those of menopausal female patients and male patients. Too few "atypical adenomas" were encountered to permit their comparison with premetastatic tumors, but our results suggest that most pituitary carcinomas arise by malignant transformation from adenomas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it