Development of a New Method for Bioassay of Allelopathy Using Protoplasts of a Leguminous Plant Mucuna pruriens With a High Content of the Allelochemical L-DOPA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study allelopathy at the cellular level, we established a new bioassay method using protoplasts from etiolated leaves of a leguminous plant, Mucuna pruriens, which contains a large amount of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) and protoplasts prepared from cotyledons, leaves or roots of Lactuca sativa (lettuce) grown in an axenic condition. The bioassay was performed using 96 multi-well culture plates and required only a small volume of medium, 50 ?L, per well. For the mixed culture of Mucuna and recipient lettuce protoplast, the optimum condition was Murashige and Skoog’s basal medium, containing 1 ?M of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 5 ?M of benzyladenine and 0.4 M mannitol solution. The inhibitory effect of M. pruriens protoplasts was found to vary with the density of the recipient L. sativa protoplasts. The M. pruriens protoplasts had no effect on the division of protoplasts from suspension cells of Oryza sativa. These results were in agreement with those obtained by the conventional plant box method. Our study offered a novel in vitro assay method, which will be widely applicable to study allelopathy of various plants on lettuce and also for quantitative studies between plant species under different culture conditions in order to simulate the possible future environmental risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it