MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005326446 · doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.948136

Six minutes walk test for individuals with schizophrenia

2014· review· en· W2005326446 on OpenAlexaff
Paquito Bernard, Ahmed Jérôme Romain, Davy Vancampfort, Aurélie Baillot, E. Esseul, Grégory Ninot

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MedicineTest (biology)Psychological interventionPhysical therapyReliability (semiconductor)PopulationAntipsychoticPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a sub-maximal exercise test measuring the distance that a patient can walk quickly in a period of 6 minutes (6MWD). The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the 6MWT's suitability for measuring the impact of an intervention, to compare the 6MWD walked by patients with schizophrenia with data for the general population or matched controls, to identify the determinants of 6MWD and to examine the measurement properties and quality procedures of the 6MWT. METHODS: Using five databases, we performed a systematic review of full-text articles published through August 2013. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met our selection criteria. The assessment of the 6MWT's suitability for measuring the impact of interventions was not made because none of the interventional studies reported a significant increase in 6MWD. The distance walked by adults with schizophrenia seemed generally shorter than that walked by healthy adults. Mean 6MWDs ranged from 421 m to 648 m in the included studies. The 6MWD is usually negatively associated with a higher Body Mass Index, increased cigarette consumption, higher doses of antipsychotic medication and lower physical self-worth in individuals with schizophrenia. The 6MWT demonstrates high reliability. To date, however, its criterion validity has not been investigated. In spite of existing guidelines, the test procedures used in the studies reviewed varied significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Future physical health monitoring recommendations for patients with schizophrenia should include the 6MWT. Future studies should investigate its predictive role and continue to assess its measurement properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The Six-Minute Walk Test reliably assesses the functional exercise capacity in patients with schizophrenia. The impact of therapeutic interventions on patients, as measured by the 6MWT, cannot be confirmed. Clinicians should take into account overweight, antipsychotic medication use and the physical self-perception when considering the functional exercise capacity in schizophrenia. Clinicians should follow International standards such as these of the American Thoracic Society when using the Six-Minute Walk Test in patients with severe mental illnesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability and RehabilitationSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207