Six minutes walk test for individuals with schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a sub-maximal exercise test measuring the distance that a patient can walk quickly in a period of 6 minutes (6MWD). The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the 6MWT's suitability for measuring the impact of an intervention, to compare the 6MWD walked by patients with schizophrenia with data for the general population or matched controls, to identify the determinants of 6MWD and to examine the measurement properties and quality procedures of the 6MWT. METHODS: Using five databases, we performed a systematic review of full-text articles published through August 2013. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met our selection criteria. The assessment of the 6MWT's suitability for measuring the impact of interventions was not made because none of the interventional studies reported a significant increase in 6MWD. The distance walked by adults with schizophrenia seemed generally shorter than that walked by healthy adults. Mean 6MWDs ranged from 421 m to 648 m in the included studies. The 6MWD is usually negatively associated with a higher Body Mass Index, increased cigarette consumption, higher doses of antipsychotic medication and lower physical self-worth in individuals with schizophrenia. The 6MWT demonstrates high reliability. To date, however, its criterion validity has not been investigated. In spite of existing guidelines, the test procedures used in the studies reviewed varied significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Future physical health monitoring recommendations for patients with schizophrenia should include the 6MWT. Future studies should investigate its predictive role and continue to assess its measurement properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The Six-Minute Walk Test reliably assesses the functional exercise capacity in patients with schizophrenia. The impact of therapeutic interventions on patients, as measured by the 6MWT, cannot be confirmed. Clinicians should take into account overweight, antipsychotic medication use and the physical self-perception when considering the functional exercise capacity in schizophrenia. Clinicians should follow International standards such as these of the American Thoracic Society when using the Six-Minute Walk Test in patients with severe mental illnesses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".