Effect of Land Use on Soil Degradation in Alpine Grassland Soil, China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grassland soils in Northern China are being seriously degraded under cultivation and grazing. This study investigated the impacts of land use on soil erosion and soil fertility in alpine grassland of China. Land uses included three levels of pasture degradation, lightly (LDP), moderately (MDP), and heavily degraded pasture (HDP) classified based on vegetation cover, and cultivated fields ranging from 1 to 50 yr of cultivation. Soil samples were collected from 18 sites at seven locations in Chernozemic soils between elevations of 2600 to 3000 m. Soil erosion was estimated by 137 Cs radioactivity. When pasture was heavily degraded, 137 Cs activity was significantly reduced, and organic C (OC), total N, and cation‐exchange capacity declined by 33, 28, and 18% respectively. Cultivation of grassland worsened soil erosion, and after 8‐, 16‐, and 41‐yr cultivation soil OC decreased by 25, 39, and 55%, respectively. Regionally, 59% of OC was lost within 30 to 50 yr of cultivation. There were concomitant losses of total N and exchange capacity. On cultivated soils, soil erosion and mineralization were equally responsible for organic C losses. Pasture degradation and cultivation also caused changes in soil P. Mineralization of organic P, incorporation of subsoil by tillage following erosion, and fertilization increased levels of Ca‐P in cultivated fields. This study indicated that grassland degradation and cultivation caused not only severe soil erosion, but also fertility decline and chemical changes of P dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it