MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coordinated dispatch of renewable energy sources and HVAC load using stochastic programming

2014· article· en· W2005399662 on OpenAlexaff
Duong Tung Nguyen, Hieu Trung Nguyen, Long Bao Le

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACDispatchable generationRenewable energyDemand responseVirtual power plantComputer scienceWind powerStochastic programmingGridAir conditioningAutomotive engineeringElectric power systemSolar powerReliability engineeringMathematical optimizationElectricityPower (physics)EngineeringDistributed generationElectrical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the potential of using aggregated heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) loads to smooth out the power fluctuation of a wind farm and/or a solar farm to make these stochastic resources more dispatchable. Specially, we consider a Virtual Power Plant (VPP) which consists of several wind/solar power units, a number of buildings with their HVAC systems, and a battery storage facility. A portion of the power generation from renewable energy sources (RESs) is used to operate HVAC systems and the rest (if any) is sold to the main grid. The design goal is to determine an optimal hourly scheduled power dispatch that the VPP must submit to electricity market to maximize its benefit. The short-term fluctuation of renewable energy generation (i.e., over intrahour intervals) is mitigated by smartly adjusting the flexible HVAC load, which enables the VPP to provide a firmed hourly dispatch. The underlying optimization problem is formulated as a two-stage stochastic program where system uncertain parameters are modeled using Monte-Carlo simulation. Building thermal dynamics model and users' climate comfort criteria are considered in the proposed optimization framework. Numerical results is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207