MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CURATIVE RECONSTRUCTION OF A GIANT MIDBASILAR TRUNK ANEURYSM WITH THE PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

2009· article· en· W2005459712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmEmbolizationRadiologySurgeryAngiographyTrunkOcclusionFusiform AneurysmBasilar arterySuperior cerebellar artery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the curative reconstruction of a giant circumferential basilar trunk aneurysm using the Pipeline embolization device (PED) (Chestnut Medical Technologies, Inc., Menlo Park, CA) alone, without embolization coils. METHODS: A 13-year-old female patient was referred for the treatment of a 4-cm, partially thrombosed, circumferential midbasilar trunk aneurysm. Her presenting symptoms included headache, nystagmus, and left upper-extremity ataxia. Open surgical and conventional endovascular treatment options were thought to be of unacceptably high risk and unlikely to achieve a definitive treatment. The patient underwent PED treatment under a Food and Drug Administration compassionate use exemption. RESULTS: An endovascular construct was built across the affected segment of the basilar trunk with 7 serially placed, telescoping PEDs, which bridged the 29-mm aneurysm neck. Completion angiography demonstrated considerably decreased flow into the aneurysm, with stasis persisting into the venous phase of angiography. No technical complications were encountered. No new neurological symptoms were evident, and the patient's original presenting symptoms resolved completely within 24 hours after the procedure. She was discharged on postoperative Day 3. Computed tomography performed on postoperative Day 5 demonstrated no change in the size of the collective aneurysm-thrombus mass. Conventional angiography performed on postoperative Day 7 showed anatomic reconstruction of the basilar artery and complete occlusion of the circumferential aneurysm. The patient remains neurologically normal. CONCLUSION: The PED provides a safe and definitive constructive treatment option for large, giant, and fusiform/circumferential aneurysms. The PED can achieve complete aneurysm occlusion without embolization coils. When applied judiciously, the PED may be used safely in vascular segments that give rise to eloquent perforators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it