MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005465654 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.2211

Mucinous cystadenoma of a horseshoe kidney: A case report and literature review

2015· article· en· W2005465654 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taku Mitome, Masahiro Yao, Udaka Naoko, Shusei Fusayasu, Koji Izumi, Kimito Osaka, Narihiko Hayashi, Noboru Nakaigawa, Yoji Nagashima, Yoshinobu Kubota

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorseshoe kidneyMucinous cystadenomaMedicineCystHistopathologyAbdomenRenal parenchymaAnatomyKidneyUrotheliumCystadenomaPathologyRadiologyUrinary systemInternal medicineOvary

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 45-year-old man complained of a palpable mass in his left abdomen. Computed tomography showed a horseshoe kidney with a Bosniak type II complicated cyst from a left segment. Three years after his initial examination, due to the growing cystic lesion and the compression imposed on the urinary collecting system and surrounding organs, we performed a left heminephrectomy. The diagnosis was mucinous cystadenoma of the kidney. No recurrence was observed 6 months after surgery. The histopathology was unique since the inner surface of the cyst was covered by a mucin-positive columnar epithelium connected to a urothelium, with continuous transition between the two. This suggests that the mucinous tumour may have originated from a sequestered segment of the renal pelvic epithelium in the renal parenchyma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesFrench-language works237,207