Ultrastructural study of the olfactory organ in adult and developing European sea bass,<i>Dicentrarchus labrax</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The olfactory organ of the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in adults and during development has been studied by light microscopy and by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. This organ includes two cavities, each extended by an accessory sac and opening to the outside through two nostrils. It contains a rosette consisting of about forty lamellae. The olfactory epithelium is characterized by the presence of two types of receptor cells, ciliated or with microvilli, and numerous ciliated nonsensory cells. Rod cells, essentially found in the altered epithelia of farmed bass, and rodlet cells are also observed. The olfactory organ forms very early in the developmental process. Two olfactory pits holding both types of sensory receptors appear 24 h before hatching. The ciliated nonsensory cells only appear at the end of the endotrophic period, shortly before the mouth opens. Although it is rather unspectacular during the larval stage, the development of the olfactory organ is characterized at the start of the juvenile stage by three important events: the formation of the nostrils, the hollowing of the accessory sacs, and the development of the rosette. This is created by raising the floor of the cavity and forming successive folds, which are the lamellae where the sensory epithelium is found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".