Grassroots Participation for Infrastructural Provisioning in Northwest Cameroon: Are Village Development Associations the Panacea?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Local communities are the loci of spatial development initiatives as they wrestle with the problem of resource scarcity and to fill the void left by the reduction in state services. This paper explores the gender dimension of grassroots participation in community development in selected localities of the Northwest Province of Cameroon. It outlines the gender roles and biases of grassroots participation through Village Development Associations (VDAs), which have become the prevalent vehicles for the galvanization of indigenous resource and building of social and human capital for project execution. Projects successfully executed include the construction of bridges and community halls, renovation of school buildings and health centres, digging and maintenance of earth roads, and the provision of pipe-borne water. In spite of communitarian efforts, VDAs are finding it difficult to embark on large-scale infrastructural development projects such as rural electrification, road construction, water supply and health centres, all of which require huge capital investments and a high degree of technical expertise. Participation is also affected by a litany of gender-based inequalities, mismanagement, ambiguous and vested interests of the elite, and complex operational structures of VDAs coupled with a politicized institutional environment. The paper concludes that although VDAs are not the cure-all, if revitalized, they can determine the local development agenda and become conduits for direct efforts at poverty reduction. RÉSUMÉ Les communautés locales sont le terrain où surgissent des initiatives de déeloppement de l'espace alors qu'elles sont aux prises avec une pénurie de ressources etse dhtnent pour combler le vide laissk par les compressions dans les services publics. L'article examine la participation selon le sexe au déeloppement communautaire dans des municipalités choisies de la province du Nord-Ouest au Cameroun. Il précise les rôles de sexe et les préjugés sexistes qui ont cours dans la participation communautaire ravivée qui s'y produisent et qui ont été ravivés par les associations de déeloppement des villages (ADV). Les ADV sont en effet devenues les principaux véhicules pour stimuler les ressources indigoènes ainsi que pour bâtir le capital social et humain nécessaire à la réalisation de projets. Voici quelques exemples de projets menks avec succès: construction de ponts et de centres communautaires; réfection d'écoles et de centres de santé; excavation et entretien de routes de terre; travaux de canalisation pour l'approvisionnement en eau. Malgré les efforts communautaires, les ADV ont de la dificulté à entreprendre de vastes projets de déeloppement d'infiastructures comme l'électrification des milieux ruraux, la construction de routes, de canalisations d'eau et de centres de santé qui exigent d'énormes investissements de capitaux et une expertise technique poussée. Plusieurs autres facteurs influencent la participation: une foule d'inégalités fondées sur le sexe; la mauvaise gestion; les intérêts acquis ambigus de l'klite; les structures de fonctionnement complexes des ADV; et un contexte institutionnel politisé En conclusion, l'article signale que les ADV ne sont pas unepanacée. Si elles sont revitalisées, elles pourront toutefois permettre de déterminer les priorités pour le déeloppement local et servir d'intermédiaires pour canaliser les efforts directs de réduction de la pauvreté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".