MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005630118 · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi119

Selection on the Structural Stability of a Ribosomal RNA Expansion Segment in Daphnia obtusa

2005· article· en· W2005630118 on OpenAlexafffund
Seanna McTaggart, Teresa J. Crease

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology and Evolution · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyIndelGeneticsHaplotypeRibosomal RNAEvolutionary biologyNegative selectionProtein secondary structureGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismAlleleGenomeGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high rate of sequence divergence in nuclear ribosomal RNA (rRNA) expansion segments offers a unique opportunity to study the importance of natural selection in their evolution. To this end, we polymerase chain reaction amplified and cloned a 589-nt fragment of the 18S rRNA gene containing expansion segments 43/e1 and 43/e4 from six individual Daphnia obtusa from four populations. We screened 2,588 clones using single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis and identified 103 unique haplotype sequences. We detected two pairs of indel sites in segment 43/e4 that complement each other when the secondary structure of the linear sequence is formed. Seven of the 12 observed combinations of length variants at these four sites (haplotypes) are shared between individuals from different populations, which may suggest that some of the length variation was present in their common ancestor. Haplotypes with uncompensated indels were only observed at low frequencies, while compensated indel haplotypes were found at a wide range of frequencies, supporting the hypothesis that the energetic stability of expansion segments is a trait under natural selection. In addition, there was strong linkage disequilibrium between the four complementary indel sites, particularly those that pair with one another in the secondary structure. Despite selection against unpaired bulges at these four indel sites, some nucleotides that form unpaired bulges are highly conserved in segment 43/e4, indicating that they are under a different selective constraint, possibly due to their role in higher level structural interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology and EvolutionSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207