Performance of the university of saskatchewan compact torus injector with curved acceleration electrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first vertical compact torus (CT) injection experiment has been performed in the Saskatchewan Torus Modified (STOR-M) tokamak [Nucl. Fusion 46, 104 (2006)]. To increase the kinetic energy density of the injected CTs for deeper penetration, the University of Saskatchewan Compact Torus Injector (USCTI) was further modified by attaching a 90 degrees curved inner electrode coaxial with the outer electrode. The modification extended the original CT acceleration section from 60 to 114 cm. Effects of the curved acceleration electrodes on the velocity and magnetic field of the CT are reported in this paper. It has been found that the CTs, injected horizontally, were deflected to vertical direction and CT velocity measured at the curved acceleration section increased to 180 kms, representing a 40% increase compared with the case without the curved inner electrode in a previous experiment. At a higher acceleration bank voltage of 16 kV, this velocity increased to about 270 kms. In addition, amplification of the CT magnetic field in the curved acceleration section has also been observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".