Overexpression of<i>hns</i>in the plant growth-promoting bacterium<i>Enterobacter cloacae</i>UW5 increases root colonization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) introduced into soil often do not compete effectively with indigenous micro-organisms for plant colonization. The aim of this study was to identify novel genes that are important for root colonization by the PGPR Enterobacter cloacae UW5. METHODS AND RESULTS: A library of transposon mutants of Ent. cloacae UW5 was screened for mutants with altered ability to colonize canola roots using a thermal asymmetric interlaced (TAIL)-PCR-based approach. A PCR fragment from one mutant was reproducibly amplified at greater levels from genomic DNA extracted from mutant pools recovered from seedling roots 6 days after seed inoculation compared to that from the cognate inoculum cultures. Competition assays confirmed that the purified mutant designated Ent. cloacae J28 outcompetes the wild-type strain on roots but not in liquid cultures. In Ent. cloacae J28, the transposon is inserted upstream of the hns gene. Quantitative RT-PCR showed that transposon insertion increased expression of hns on roots. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that increased expression of hns in Ent. cloacae enhances competitive colonization of roots. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: A better understanding of the genes involved in plant colonization will contribute to the development of PGPR that can compete more effectively in agricultural soils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".