A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: Bench or experimental
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.218
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.505
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Nature
- Topic
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Field
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Canadian institutions
- McGill UniversityMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteEuropean Regional Development FundSocialstyrelsenNational Institutes of HealthFédération Française de CardiologieAssociation Diabète Risque VasculaireJeanssons StiftelserUniversité de LausanneVetenskapsrådetLudwig Institute for Cancer ResearchIsrael Science FoundationNational Institute of Mental HealthVINNOVAStiftelsen för Strategisk ForskningResearch Councils UKMedical Research CouncilLes Laboratories Pierre FabreWellcome TrustInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleFondation de FranceNovo NordiskNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDirection de l’hospitalisation et de l’offre de SoinsEli Lilly and CompanyGenome CanadaÅke Wiberg StiftelseOulun YliopistoNovartis PharmaEuropean CommissionBiocenter, University of OuluSanofiGlaxoSmithKline
- Keywords
- Missing heritability problemGeneticsBiologyObesityPenetranceGenome-wide association studyCopy-number variationHeritabilityPopulationGenetic heterogeneitySingle-nucleotide polymorphismPhenotypeBioinformaticsGeneMedicineGenotypeGenomeEndocrinology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no