Experience With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome at a Single Institution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS) is a serious and potentially life threatening histiocytic disorder in children and adults. The most commonly used protocol-based therapy includes corticosteroids, cyclosporine-A, and etoposide. However, patients are often started on corticosteroid alone with or without the addition of intravenous gamma-globulin. The role of the various therapies in HLH/MAS remains undefined. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient-related factors that led to the use of full protocol therapy (HLH 1994/2004) and to determine treatment-related factors that were associated with adverse outcome including relapse and death. DESIGN/METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with HLH/MAS between January 1998 and December 2005 were included in this study. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients had a median age of 9.1 years at diagnosis. Underlying diagnoses were: viral/other 42%; rheumatologic 37%; and malignancy 21%. Initial treatment included corticosteroids 29%; intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) 18%; steroids+IVIG 8%; cyclosporine 5%; etoposide 5%; HLH protocol 32%. Etoposide was eventually used in 21% (3/14) of rheumatology and 75% (18/25) viral/other patients. In all, 5/14 (36%) rheumatology and 12/16 (75%) viral/other patients required intensive care unit admission, and 1/14 (7.1%) rheumatology, and 6/16 (38%) viral/other patients died. Three children received a bone marrow transplant. Eleven of 38 (29%) patients died, despite 8 having received etoposide therapy. Three deaths were secondary to underlying malignancy and one from transplant-related complication for malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HLH are at high risk for death early in their disease course. However, corticosteroids and/or IVIG may be sufficient as first-line therapy for patients with underlying rheumatologic disease who present with HLH/MAS. Further prospective studies are required to more precisely define early risk factors for poor outcomes in this often fatal disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".