Liner Shipping Cargo Allocation with Repositioning of Empty Containers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the cargo allocation problem considering empty repositioning of containers for a liner shipping company. The aim is to maximize the profit of transported cargo in a network, subject to the cost and availability of empty containers. The formulation is a multi-commodity flow problem with additional inter-balancing constraints to control repositioning of empty containers. In a study of the cost efficiency of the global container-shipping network, Song et al. (2005) estimate that empty repositioning cost constitutes 27% of the total world fleet running cost. An arc-flow formulation is decomposed using the Dantzig-Wolfe principle to a path-flow formulation. A linear relaxation is solved with a delayed column generation algorithm. A feasible integer solution is found by rounding the fractional solution and adjusting flow balance constraints with leased containers. Computational results are reported for seven instances based on real-life shipping networks. Solving the relaxed linear path-flow model with a column generation algorithm outperforms solving the relaxed linear arc-flow model with the CPLEX barrier solver even for very small instances. The proposed algorithm is able to solve instances with 234 ports, 16,278 demands over 9 time periods in 34 min. The integer solutions found by rounding down are computed in less than 5 s and the gap is within 0.01% from the upper bound of the linear relaxation. The solved instances are quite large compared to those tested in the reviewed literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".