MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction

2014· review· en· W2005864827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Pasnick, W. Graham Carlos, Ambalavanan Arunachalam, Frederic M. Celestin, Jonathan P. Parsons, Teal S. Hallstrand, Sandra D. Anderson, Kevin C. Wilson, Carey C. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchoconstrictionMedalGold medalAsthmaSports medicineFamily medicinePhysical therapyHistoryArt historyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The invitation by the editor, Rafeul Alam, to guest edit this issue on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) allowed me to bring together investigators from physiology to cellular biology of EIB. The preface contains information on how some of the contributors came together and identifies some conferences that helped broaden the scientific research in EIB in asthmatic children to include healthy elite athletes. The contributors come from Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Israel, Sweden, Netherlands, and the United States and trained in pediatric, respiratory, and sports medicine and science. Most have either obtained a doctoral degree in EIB or supervised one. My first encounter with EIB was at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, in Sydney, in 1968. In January 1970 I started research in EIB with Simon Godfrey in the Department of Paediatrics at the Brompton Hospital in London. Over the next 3 years, under Simon’s enthusiastic guidance, a group of us carried out many studies on various aspects of EIB. In 1968 Ken Fitch from Perth, Australia observed severe EIB when supervising an exercise test on an 18-year-old asthmatic Olympic swimmer, who 3 months later won an Olympic Gold Medal in Mexico. This induced Ken to do his MD in EIB. Both Simon and Ken’s laboratories were coincidentally investigating the effect of different forms of exercise to provoke EIB. In 1971, both laboratories reported running as the most provocative exercise. Being ahead of their time, Ken and Simon wrote an article in 1976 on the topic of Asthma and Athletic Performance. They now celebrate the 50 years of research since the modern description of EIB in children by R.S. Jones of Liverpool, United Kingdom, in 1962. In 1973 Simon moved to the Hammersmith Hospital and later, in 1977, to Israel, where he continued his studies, among many others, on refractoriness and EIB. The article by Larsson and coworkers discusses these early studies and presents a new hypothesis to explain refractoriness following EIB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207