Delayed Repair of Lateral Orbital Wall and Orbital Floor Fracture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Timing of surgical management of facial fractures may differ from the current standard when an associated severe ophthalmologic injury exists; this may necessitate a delay in repair to protect the patient's vision. We set out to demonstrate that good functional and aesthetic outcomes can be achieved in cases where zygoma bone fracture repair had to be delayed for more than 21 days after injury with a specific surgical plan.Using the electronic database from Montreal General Hospital, a level I trauma center, a retrospective review of all facial fractures occurring from 1994 to 2009 was performed. Our review returned a total of 22,727 trauma patients admitted to Montreal General Hospital. Of these, 2672 sustained 1 or more facial fractures. Among the facial trauma patients, 945 patients' injuries included a zygoma fracture, 324 (35.3%) of which were managed operatively. Seven cases had their surgery delayed for more than 21 days after injury, 2 of which were managed using simple osteotomies and plate fixations, without the need for bone grafts. Both patients demonstrated a satisfactory outcome with improvement relative to their preoperative status. We provide a detailed description of our most recent case of a 73-year-old woman in whom the surgical repair of the lateral orbital rim and orbital floor was delayed for 10 weeks to allow healing of her associated traumatic retinal detachment.For patients with associated ocular injuries who cannot undergo orbital fracture repair within 21 days of the trauma, delayed surgery may still result in an acceptable aesthetic result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".