MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006171198 · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.023408

Laser-induced electron recollision in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>and electron correlation

2005· article· lv· W2006171198 on OpenAlexaff
André D. Bandrauk, Huizhong Lu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsIonizationAtomic physicsElectronExcited stateDouble ionizationExcitationIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single and double ionization processes are calculated for a 1D model of ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$ from numerical solution of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation in the presence of an intense $I\ensuremath{\leqslant}5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{15}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}∕{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, ultrashort $(10\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{cycles})$ $800\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ laser pulse. Laser-induced electron recollision, LIERC, is identified from a systematic analysis of bound and continuum populations in the two-electron wave function. Recollision is shown to be responsible for double ionization at lower intensities, $I&lt;{10}^{15}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}∕{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$ and persists also in the first two excited states of ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$, the $A\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{3}\ensuremath{\Sigma}_{u}^{+}$ and $B\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{1}\ensuremath{\Sigma}_{u}^{+}$ states. The effects of the symmetry (antisymmetry) of the two-electrons wave function is found to be dominant at large internuclear distances where enhanced ionization is operative, especially in the $A\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}^{3}\ensuremath{\Sigma}_{u}^{+}$, where the exclusion principle suppresses double ionization from LIERC. Furthermore, at large distances, double ionization is shown to occur with equal excitation of the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals of the ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}^{+}$ core ion. Negligible core excitation occurs at equilibrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207