MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006202814 · doi:10.1002/eji.200636726

JNK2 negatively regulates CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell effector function and anti‐tumor immune response

2007· article· en· W2006202814 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Tao, Yunfei Gao, Ming O. Li, Weifeng He, Liang Chen, Bohdan Harvev, Roger J. Davis, Richard A. Flavell, Zhinan Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsBiologyCytotoxic T cellCD8Immune systemEffectorCell biologyGranzyme BT cellImmunologyIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JNK1 and JNK2 have distinct effects on activation, differentiation and function of CD8+ T cells. Our early studies demonstrated that JNK1 is required for CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor immune surveillance. However, the role of JNK2 in CD8+ T cell response and effector functions, especially in anti-tumor immune response, is unknown. To define the role of JNK2 in antigen-specific immune response, we have investigated CD8+ T cells from OT-1 CD8+ transgenic mice in response to either high- or low-affinity peptides. JNK2-/- CD8+ T cells proliferated better in response to both peptides, with more cell division and less cell death. In addition, JNK2-/- CD8+ T cells produced higher levels of IFN-gamma, which is associated with increased expression of T-bet and Eomesodermin (Eomes). Moreover, JNK2-/- CD8+ T cells expresses high levels of granzyme B and show increased CTL activity. Finally, the enhanced expansion and effector function of JNK2-/- CD8+ T cells was further evidenced by their capacity to delay tumor growth in vivo. In summary, our results demonstrate that JNK2 negatively regulates antigen-specific CD8+ T cell expansion and effector function, and thus selectively blocking JNK2 in CD8+ T cells may potentially enhance anti-tumor immune response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207