MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006213427 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.045150

Deconstruction of resolution effects in angle-resolved photoemission

2014· article· en· W2006213427 on OpenAlexaff
G. Levy, Will Nettke, B. M. Ludbrook, C. N. Veenstra, A. Damascelli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngle-resolved photoemission spectroscopyQuasiparticleResolution (logic)PhysicsMomentum (technical analysis)Fermi surfaceFermi levelInverse photoemission spectroscopyLaser linewidthSpectral lineComputational physicsCondensed matter physicsElectronic structureOpticsQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study how the energy and momentum resolution of angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) affects the linewidth, Fermi crossing, velocity, and curvature of the measured band structure. Based on the fact that the resolution smoothes out the spectra, acting as a low-pass filter, we develop an iterative simulation scheme that compensates for resolution effects and allows the fundamental physical parameters to be accurately extracted. By simulating a parabolic band structure of Fermi-liquid quasiparticles, we show that this method works for an energy resolution up to 100 meV and a momentum resolution equal to twice the energy resolution scaled by the Fermi velocity. Our analysis acquires particular relevance in the hard and soft x-ray regimes, where a degraded resolution limits the accuracy of the extracted physical parameters, making it possible to study how the electronic excitations are modified when the ARPES probing depth increases beyond the surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207