Cardioprotective Effects of Diltiazem during Acute Rejection on Heterotopic Heart Transplants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the presence of severe rejection, cardiac allograft perfusion has been shown to be impaired. Since a functionally reversible vasoconstrictor component has been identified in this condition and rejection does not reverse if ischemia does not, we hypothesized that diltiazem may be beneficial in this condition. Experiments were performed on dogs with heterotopic heart transplants and chronic instrumentation for the assessment of allograft perfusion. Two groups of cardiac allograft recipients were studied: untreated recipients and recipients treated with the calcium antagonist diltiazem (180 mg twice daily, orally). Allograft blood flow was monitored daily along with plasma diltiazem levels. The lymphoproliferative response to mitogens was studied at selected intervals until terminal rejection. Contractile function of the graft was assessed daily by palpation. Without immunosuppression, terminal rejection was observed within 7 days. Rejection was confirmed by histology; cellular infiltration and myocyte necrosis were present in all cardiac allografts but to a significantly lesser degree in diltiazem-treated recipients. The mean blood flow of heterotopically implanted hearts was in the range of 35-50 ml/min, which decreased steadily in untreated recipients. In contrast, significant improvement of allograft perfusion was observed in diltiazem-treated recipients at days 4-6 after transplantation. Diltiazem also significantly attenuated mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation at peak sensitivity (2 days after transplantation). Diltiazem plasma concentrations were in the therapeutic range (30-60 ng/ml) before and after cardiac transplantation. Results of the present study demonstrate beneficial effects of diltiazem in the course of severe cardiac rejection. Such findings support its use during rejection when maintenance of graft blood flow and myocyte protection may be important for myocardial function and viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".