MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006229790 · doi:10.1002/jmv.20493

Molecular characterization of a Canadian human parechovirus (HPeV)-3 isolate and its relationship to other HPeVs

2005· article· en· W2006229790 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yacine Abed, Guy Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Virology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapsidBiologyVirologyGenomePhylogenetic treeGeneticsGeneVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new member of the Parechovirus genus (HPeV-3) has been recently isolated from a stool specimen of a young Japanese child with transient paralysis (isolate A308/99). Three additional HPeV-3 Canadian cases associated with severe neonatal infections were subsequently described by our group. At this time, limited information is available on the molecular characterization of the HPeV-3 genome. In this study, we report the complete genome sequence of a Canadian HPeV-3 isolate (Can82853-01) recovered in 2001 from the nasopharyngeal aspirate of a neonate with a sepsis-like syndrome. The Can82853-01 genome was 7,322 nucleotides (nt) in length and had 96.4%, 77.7%, and 77.5% nt identity with the A308/99 (HPeV-3), HPeV-1, and HPeV-2 reference strains, respectively. Furthermore, the Can82853-01 polyprotein had 98.2%, 86.9%, and 84.7% amino acids identity compared to the same viruses. Most differences between the polyproteins of HPeV-3 isolates and those of HPeV-1 and -2 were located in the VP0-VP3-VP1 capsid region whereas the non-structural proteins were relatively conserved. The primary and predicted secondary structures of 5'UTR and 3'UTR of the HPeV-3 isolates were also different than those of HPeV-1 and -2 reference strains. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the relatedness between Can82853-01 and A308/99 and their divergence from other picornaviruses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical VirologySame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207