MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Torpor patterns of hibernating eastern chipmunks <i>Tamias striatus</i> vary in response to the size and fatty acid composition of food hoards

2005· article· en· W2006243101 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Daniel Munro, Donald W. Thomas, Murray M. Humphries

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Ecology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsTorporBiologyHibernation (computing)Polyunsaturated fatty acidThermoregulationEcologyHomeothermyAnimal scienceZoologyFatty acidBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Many endotherms employ torpor during periods of resource scarcity, but this state of substantially reduced body temperature and metabolism appears to impose significant physiological costs. Accordingly, individuals can be expected to vary the expression of torpor according to the size of their energy reserves. Although dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are important for maintaining the fluidity of membrane phospholipids and depot fats at low body temperatures, they are also prone to autoxidation, which can result in significant somatic damage. Dietary PUFA may thus influence the depth and duration of torpor during hibernation. We evaluated the hypothesis that both an increase in the size of the burrow food hoard and an elevation of its PUFA composition can cause chipmunks to reduce their use of torpor both by reducing the time spent torpid and by maintaining higher body temperature during torpor. We provided individual chipmunks with equicaloric natural‐PUFA and high‐PUFA supplements 10 days prior to autumn immergence. We measured seven parameters that characterize the depth and duration of torpor used by hibernating chipmunks using temperature‐sensitive data loggers mounted on neck collars. We compared torpor patterns for the natural‐PUFA, high‐PUFA and control groups at a study site in southern Quebec, Canada. We also compared control animals from Quebec with unsupplemented controls from a more southerly site in Pennsylvania, USA characterized by higher food availability and less severe winters. Chipmunks provided with natural‐PUFA supplements spent less than half as much time in torpor as control animals at the same study site, and when in torpor they exhibited skin temperatures almost twice as high as controls. Chipmunks provided with high‐PUFA supplements significantly reduced the depth and duration of torpor bouts compared with animals provided with natural‐PUFA supplements. The torpor patterns of unsupplemented chipmunks at the southern site approximated those of natural‐PUFA chipmunks at the main study site. Our results provide clear evidence that chipmunks adjust the depth and duration of torpor expression according to both the size and the composition of their energy reserves. Furthermore, both the extent and the nutritional form of environmental energy availability are important determinants of the cost and benefits of torpor expression by free‐ranging endotherms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal EcologySame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207