Obturator Externus Bursa: Anatomic Origin and MR Imaging Features of Pathologic Involvement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomy of the obturator externus bursa of the hip and describe the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of pathologic involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors dissected eight cadaver hemipelvises to assess for the presence of periarticular bursae of the hip and bursal communication with the fascial plane of the obturator externus muscle. In addition, 10 consecutive patients with obturator externus bursa enlargement were prospectively identified with MR imaging. A bursa was considered present when a fluid collection was seen extending along the obturator externus muscle, continuous with the posterior inferior hip joint. The direction, extent, contour, and thickness of the bursa and hip capsule were recorded. Surgical findings were available for eight of the 10 patients, with histopathologic correlation between the bursal lining and hip capsule. RESULTS: At cadaveric dissection, one specimen showed a bursa communicating with and extending from the posteroinferior aspect of the hip joint deep to the obturator externus tendon. In all 10 patients, MR images showed a hip joint effusion with a continuous bursa extending medially and displacing the obturator externus inferiorly. At surgery, a bursa was seen displacing the obturator externus muscle inferiorly and originating from the posteroinferior aspect of the hip joint in all eight patients. Results of pathologic analysis confirmed disease identical to the primary hip abnormality in all eight patients. CONCLUSION: The obturator externus bursa is a potential posteroinferior communication of the hip joint capsule, can be a site of disease spread from the hip joint, and can be accurately identified with MR imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".