I-VFRP: An interval-valued fuzzy robust programming approach for municipal waste-management planning under uncertainty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an interval-valued fuzzy robust programming (I-VFRP) model has been developed and applied to municipal solid-waste management under uncertainty. The I-VFRP model can explicitly address system uncertainties with multiple presentations, and can directly communicate the waste manager's confidence gradients into the optimization process, facilitating the reflection of weak or strong confidence when subjectively estimating parameter values. Parameters in the I-VFRP model can be represented as either intervals or interval-valued fuzzy sets. Thus, variations of the waste manager's confidence gradients over defining parameters can be effectively handled through interval-valued membership functions, leading to enhanced robustness of the optimization efforts. The results of a theoretical case study indicate that useful solutions for planning municipal solid-waste-management practices can be generated. The waste manager's confidence gradients over various subjective judgments can be directly incorporated into the modeling formulation and solution process. The results also suggest that the proposed methodology can be applied to practical problems that are associated with complex and uncertain information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it